Hi,

+1 from me.

Code compiles and tests successfully run.

PS: For newcomers, we should consider to place build instructions at README
file instead of pointing wiki.

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:46 PM Sebastian Nagel <wastl.na...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, Jorge!
>
> > I would probably change a couple of details in the deprecation notice.
> If it is ok
> > with you I can send a PR for this later today. But since I see the
> deprecation notice
> > after the release I think we're good to go.
>
> You mean the deprecation notice in the README.md?
> It can be improved for sure. I think it's not the most important one, as
> it's only in the 2.x branch
> and not the master branch. But we need notices on the web site as well.
> Any help to formulate this nicely is welcome. Thanks!
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> On 02.10.19 17:12, Jorge Betancourt wrote:
> > Hi Seb!
> >
> > Everything looks ok from my side:
> > Compiled successfully from the release-2.4 tag. Tests passed and ran a
> small crawl.
> >
> > +1 from my side.
> >
> > Small detail. I would probably change a couple of details in the
> deprecation notice. If it is ok
> > with you I can send a PR for this later today. But since I see the
> deprecation notice after the
> > release I think we're good to go.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Jorge
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM BlackIce <blackice...@gmail.com
> <mailto:blackice...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     It makes sense what your saying, better to wrap things up in a tidy
> way.
> >     I got it last night, I'll give it a spin a bit later
> >
> >     Greetz
> >
> >     On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:41 AM Sebastian Nagel <
> wastl.na...@googlemail.com
> >     <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         > Is it even relevant at all?
> >
> >         The release of 2.3.1 dates back to January 2016. That's quite a
> long
> >         time and we cannot recommend to use 2.3.1 anymore mostly due to
> outdated
> >         and potentially vulnerable upstream dependencies Nutch relies on.
> >         So, in consequence we would need to advice all users of 2.3.1 to
> switch
> >         to use 1.x/1.15 immediately.
> >
> >         Also, there are 81 issues resolved in 2.4 - the work on 2.x
> still continued
> >         in 2016 and 2017, began to slow down in 2018 and almost entirely
> stopped
> >         this year with only a few commits related to maintenance issues.
> Would be
> >         somehow sad to leave all the work done addressing these 81
> issues unreleased.
> >
> >         Of course, if there is nobody which takes the time to test the
> release and
> >         vote for it because all thinks it isn't relevant: this would be
> a clear vote
> >         not to release and to announce the end of 2.x right now and to
> withdraw the
> >         2.3.1 release packages. The code would be still accessible from
> the release
> >         archives and it will als remain in the repositories anyway.
> >
> >         Best,
> >         Sebastian
> >
> >
> >         On 9/24/19 12:11 PM, BlackIce wrote:
> >         > Is it even relevant at all?
> >         >
> >         > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:54 AM Sebastian Nagel <
> wastl.na...@googlemail.com
> >         <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com>
> >         > <mailto:wastl.na...@googlemail.com <mailto:
> wastl.na...@googlemail.com>>> wrote:
> >         >
> >         >     Hi Folks,
> >         >
> >         >     A first candidate for the Nutch 2.4 release is available
> at:
> >         >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nutch/2.4/
> >         >
> >         >     The release candidate is a zip and tar.gz archive of
> sources in:
> >         >       https://github.com/apache/nutch/tree/release-2.4
> >         >
> >         >     In addition, a staged maven repository is available here:
> >         >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-1016/
> >         >
> >         >     We addressed 81 issues:
> >         >       https://s.apache.org/bFfL
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >     Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 2.4.
> >         >     The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> majority of at
> >         >     least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
> >         >
> >         >     [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 2.4.
> >         >     [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >     Cheers,
> >         >     Sebastian
> >         >     (On behalf of the Nutch PMC)
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >     P.S. Here is my +1
> >         >          Unit tests pass and I've successfully run a small
> test crawl
> >         >          using HBase 1.14.10
> >         >
> >         >     P.S. Note that the release of 2.4 is considered to be the
> last release
> >         >          on the 2.x branch. Development on this branch has
> been retired
> >         >          with no active committers working on it and as Nutch
> PMC we feel
> >         >          unable to upkeep the support of the 2.x branch. More
> details will
> >         >          be shared as soon as 2.4 is released.
> >         >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to