On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:43 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > just wanted to mention that there's also an automatic mirror on Gitlab at: > > > > https://gitlab.com/nuttx > > > There are dozens of mirrors of the NuttX Bitbucket repositories. Google > nuttx+mirror to see some of them. > > An alternative disposition of the Bitbucket repositories might be to > make them manual mirrors of the Apache repositories. AFAIK Bitbucket > does not support automated mirroring without a plug-in. But periodic > manually mirroring of the Apache repositories would help by assuring > that the Apache licensed code is pushed out to all NuttX mirrors as well. > > I really don't know what is the best thing to do. I think, ideally, > every user and every mirror should transition to the Apache code and > that there should not be some creeping unsupported BSD version. If > someone decides to start supporting that stranded BSD version, then you > would have a BSD fork to deal with. And trademark issues too. There > cannot be a different OS called NuttX; there can be only one. I just > cannot imagine a positive scenario with retaining an unsupported BSD > version of the RTOS. I doubt the ASF would appreciate that either? > > Still just brainstorming..
I think we need to ask our mentors what is the generally accepted thing to do with the project's earlier incarnation. Nathan
