Hi Greg, On 12/10/19, Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Certainly there are other forks of NuttX all over the internet (not >> mirrors, but usually older clones), but I think people would always >> want to go to the authoritative source and currently the world >> believes that the Bitbucket repository is the authoritative source. >> Hopefully that will change over time. > Certainly, there is no benefit to keep an old static version of the last > of the earlier incarnation. Anyone can recover that at will by checking > out that last version from GIT. If we are smart, we can tag the initial > Apache import to make that easier. >
What if we could keep the bitbucket for a while and use the git "post-update" to updated the clone repository to the new apache repository? More info: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19434605/git-redirections https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucketserver/using-repository-hooks-776639836.html What do you think? If you don't agree, then as an way to be helpful for new users, I think it should better only removing the repository content and putting a README file instructing the user to clone the new apache repository. BR, Alan
