But I think that someone from committer need convert patch to the github pull request, and then pass all automatic check before submitting the change. To ensure the commit quality, nobody can bypass the workflow we will setup.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 9:48 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just a guess, but I think right now we receive 50 or so patches for each > PR. That is very deeply ingrained in NuttX userland. > > On 12/15/2019 7:45 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > >> I am just wondering if we are excluding any users by forcing everyone > >> to use PRs. I personally don't have problems with mixed PRs and > >> patches, provided that the patches apply clean. I think we should > >> take the side of the lowest common denominator user and NOT the point > >> of view that makes our job the slickest. > >> > > Remember that the majority of NuttX users do not use git at all. They > > use the release tarballs which have all GIT information stripped out. > > No GIT and not GIT knowledge is required to use NuttX. I don't know > > if it is customary to strip GIT out of Apache tarballs, but still we > > need to accept users that have no GIT skills. > > > > It is one of the core principles of NuttX that "all users matter" and > > that we do nothing to restrict the use of the OS, especially not to > > make out internal life simpler at the expense of a world of users. We > > should do the opposite; we should keep the complexit o y inside the > > project and do all we can to make NuttX accessible to all users. > > > > Greg > >
