issues@ is a good name, let's follow the convention.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 1:06 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. > > but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to > > rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev > > list? > > While reading some projects' board reports, I came across this: > > > Gitbox traffic is now going to issues@. The community was losing dev@ > > subscribers because of the high volume of traffic from Gitbox. > > Once we are all set up and ready to receive patches/PRs, we may run > into the same issue. > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:34 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. > > but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to > > rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev > > list? > > > > Thanks > > Xiang > > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM spudaneco <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I may grumble a bit bur I always follow Justin's advice.I do think that > > > NuttX is diferent from other new podlings because began with a huge user > > > base and has a few different needs on day 1 as a mature project.I don't > > > believe that finding new committers will be a problem.Sent from Samsung > > > tablet. > > > -------- Original message --------From: Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> Date: > > > 12/26/19 1:23 AM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: User > > > Email Account I think what Justin is saying is that it's going to seem > > > like > > > uncomfortablechaos for a bit, but will eventually settle down into a > > > better > > > state.From what I know about well-functioning teams, that seems right. > > > Form,storm, norm, > > > perform.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuckman%27s_stages_of_group_development> > > > :)cheersadamOn Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 8:28 PM Justin Mclean > > > <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:> Hi,>> Most of those are not current > > > incubating projects. Some of them did not> become to level projects. Just > > > about all did not start with user lists.> Creating a seperate user list > > > this > > > early in previous incubating projects> has slowed or hindered their > > > community growth. You want users involved so> that they become committers. > > > At no point have I said you can't do this but> the PPMC needs to carefully > > > consider it. My Internet access is limited> right now but if you search on > > > the incubator general list you'll see> several discussions on this.>> > > > Thanks,> Justin>-- Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io>
