sounds like a good ideea lets hope that we can still maintain the dev focus with less distraction
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 19:43 Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think is it a good idea! It will avoid increase the volume of emails > to dev@ list. > > BR, > > Alan > > On 12/27/19, Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. > >> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to > >> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev > >> list? > > > > While reading some projects' board reports, I came across this: > > > >> Gitbox traffic is now going to issues@. The community was losing dev@ > >> subscribers because of the high volume of traffic from Gitbox. > > > > Once we are all set up and ready to receive patches/PRs, we may run > > into the same issue. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:34 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. > >> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to > >> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev > >> list? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Xiang > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM spudaneco <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > I may grumble a bit bur I always follow Justin's advice.I do think > that > >> > NuttX is diferent from other new podlings because began with a huge > >> > user > >> > base and has a few different needs on day 1 as a mature project.I > don't > >> > believe that finding new committers will be a problem.Sent from > Samsung > >> > tablet. > >> > -------- Original message --------From: Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> > >> > Date: > >> > 12/26/19 1:23 AM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: > >> > User > >> > Email Account I think what Justin is saying is that it's going to seem > >> > like > >> > uncomfortablechaos for a bit, but will eventually settle down into a > >> > better > >> > state.From what I know about well-functioning teams, that seems right. > >> > Form,storm, norm, > >> > perform.< > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuckman%27s_stages_of_group_development> > >> > :)cheersadamOn Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 8:28 PM Justin Mclean > >> > <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:> Hi,>> Most of those are not current > >> > incubating projects. Some of them did not> become to level projects. > >> > Just > >> > about all did not start with user lists.> Creating a seperate user > list > >> > this > >> > early in previous incubating projects> has slowed or hindered their > >> > community growth. You want users involved so> that they become > >> > committers. > >> > At no point have I said you can't do this but> the PPMC needs to > >> > carefully > >> > consider it. My Internet access is limited> right now but if you > search > >> > on > >> > the incubator general list you'll see> several discussions on this.>> > >> > Thanks,> Justin>-- Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> > > >
