I think is it a good idea! It will avoid increase the volume of emails to dev@ list.
BR, Alan On 12/27/19, Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. >> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to >> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev >> list? > > While reading some projects' board reports, I came across this: > >> Gitbox traffic is now going to issues@. The community was losing dev@ >> subscribers because of the high volume of traffic from Gitbox. > > Once we are all set up and ready to receive patches/PRs, we may run > into the same issue. > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:34 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> The dev list traffic may reduce after we finish the workflow discussion. >> but email from GibBox will become more and more, can we send them to >> rev...@nuttx.apache.org to avoid the review message mess up the dev >> list? >> >> Thanks >> Xiang >> >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:19 PM spudaneco <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I may grumble a bit bur I always follow Justin's advice.I do think that >> > NuttX is diferent from other new podlings because began with a huge >> > user >> > base and has a few different needs on day 1 as a mature project.I don't >> > believe that finding new committers will be a problem.Sent from Samsung >> > tablet. >> > -------- Original message --------From: Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> >> > Date: >> > 12/26/19 1:23 AM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: >> > User >> > Email Account I think what Justin is saying is that it's going to seem >> > like >> > uncomfortablechaos for a bit, but will eventually settle down into a >> > better >> > state.From what I know about well-functioning teams, that seems right. >> > Form,storm, norm, >> > perform.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuckman%27s_stages_of_group_development> >> > :)cheersadamOn Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 8:28 PM Justin Mclean >> > <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:> Hi,>> Most of those are not current >> > incubating projects. Some of them did not> become to level projects. >> > Just >> > about all did not start with user lists.> Creating a seperate user list >> > this >> > early in previous incubating projects> has slowed or hindered their >> > community growth. You want users involved so> that they become >> > committers. >> > At no point have I said you can't do this but> the PPMC needs to >> > carefully >> > consider it. My Internet access is limited> right now but if you search >> > on >> > the incubator general list you'll see> several discussions on this.>> >> > Thanks,> Justin>-- Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io> >
