On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:56 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/27/22, Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the checklist, there are two points where we gonna need external > > help, probably from our mentors: > > > > 1. Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases > > 2. Demonstrate community readiness > > > > For the first one, Nathan has summarized above the work that has been > > done. We believe that the project has demonstrated the ability to > > create Apache releases, but is there something else to consider? > > For the second one, I'm not sure what it means. If it's regarding the > > health of the project technically, again Nathan has summarized the > > accomplishments. If it's regarding the conduct of the project with > > regards to the Apache way, I believe we've been on track. > > > >> I hope we get github.com/apache/nuttx and github.com/apache/apps soon > >> (hope > > they accept we use this /apps name, will make our users life easier!) > > > > The apps one is confusing. It doesn't indicate that it's part of > > NuttX. Actually, it doesn't indicate what project it belongs to at > > all and I believe a lot of people would ask what this is. > > > > Yes, that is the point! Probably they will not accept it because it > could confuse other people, but probably having a README.md could be > enough to make it clear. Alternatively we could to modify the build > system for accept ../apps and ../nuttx_apps.
Is it too difficult to do: (HYPOTHETICAL command, if apps is called nuttx-apps) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps apps ? In effect we would strip the "incubator-" prefix from both repositories and call it done. Cheers, Nathan
