Yes, it is all details, but it is better to use a repository name that users don't need pass that name in the configure or keep passing a name after the clone command.
So let us think how to make the life of users easier. BR, Alan On 6/27/22, Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, we can do that, and this is what most of us do (although I forgot > the last time I had to clone the repos). On the other hand, > ./configure accepts a different apps path with the -a option. It just > defaults to ../apps, but technically it can be anywhere and named > anything. > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:18 AM Nathan Hartman > <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:56 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis >> <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On 6/27/22, Abdelatif Guettouche <abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > For the checklist, there are two points where we gonna need external >> > > help, probably from our mentors: >> > > >> > > 1. Demonstrate ability to create Apache releases >> > > 2. Demonstrate community readiness >> > > >> > > For the first one, Nathan has summarized above the work that has been >> > > done. We believe that the project has demonstrated the ability to >> > > create Apache releases, but is there something else to consider? >> > > For the second one, I'm not sure what it means. If it's regarding >> > > the >> > > health of the project technically, again Nathan has summarized the >> > > accomplishments. If it's regarding the conduct of the project with >> > > regards to the Apache way, I believe we've been on track. >> > > >> > >> I hope we get github.com/apache/nuttx and github.com/apache/apps >> > >> soon >> > >> (hope >> > > they accept we use this /apps name, will make our users life easier!) >> > > >> > > The apps one is confusing. It doesn't indicate that it's part of >> > > NuttX. Actually, it doesn't indicate what project it belongs to at >> > > all and I believe a lot of people would ask what this is. >> > > >> > >> > Yes, that is the point! Probably they will not accept it because it >> > could confuse other people, but probably having a README.md could be >> > enough to make it clear. Alternatively we could to modify the build >> > system for accept ../apps and ../nuttx_apps. >> >> >> Is it too difficult to do: >> >> (HYPOTHETICAL command, if apps is called nuttx-apps) >> >> $ git clone https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps apps >> >> ? >> >> In effect we would strip the "incubator-" prefix from both >> repositories and call it done. >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >
