I think that we should modify the paths so that we use nuttx and nuttx_apps folders. In my opinion this will be less confusing for the users
Best regards Alin -----Original Message----- From: Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> Sent: den 28 juni 2022 02:55 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate NuttX as TLP Congratulations on NuttX Graduation and all of the achievements! :-) On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:18 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > I don't know you guys but I hate this incubator-nuttx and > incubator-nuttx-apps repositories names. > > I hope we get github.com/apache/nuttx and github.com/apache/apps soon > (hope they accept we use this /apps name, will make our users life > easier!) +1 :-) How about something like nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps ? It was not clear for me what apps are and if they are mandatory.. keeping apache/apps could be even more confusing.. also I usually keep `.git` suffix for directories that keep git repos and that was not working here :-) Maybe just nuttx + nuttx/nuttx_apps where apps are git submodule kept as it is right now in a sperate repo for easier maintenance? :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.tomek.cedro.info__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!6HrO-4qVO1mY_faiW-6kxCv6sQxyeUdYuL9_HLWZCaxV9eclVaPiUFuThqR-7C8RXGs6X-G2MtYdfE46lg$
