On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:01 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > how about > nuttx-core > nuttx-apps
rtos part would clearly say what is NuttX even / especially for people who do not know it yet, i.e. FreeRTOS is self-explanatory :-) thus nuttx-rtos + nuttx-apps / nuttx_rtos + nuttx_apps whatever fits required conventions seems more intuitive :-) core looks more like a library or a coredump and does not really directly leads to rtos :-) if project repo split is planned at some point then it could be nuttx-kernel, nuttx-libs, nuttx-drv, nuttx-cpu-riscv, nuttx-board-esp32c3, nuttx-doc, nuttx-apps, etc, maybe even higher or lower granularity :-) but whatever works and is more desired would be fine i am sure that there will be ways to overcome toolchains limitations when stuff inside fits requirements :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
