On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote: > From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a top > level name) related to Appache rules, which I think is indeed not acceptable. > It would not imply any source code organization change nor submodules: > > git clone <appache url>/nuttx/core nuttx > git clone <appache url>/nuttx/apps apps
The use of submodules was also considered before (I also proposed that) and turned out to be a bad idea :-) :-) > Anyway, from all the discussion, since hyphens should not be used according > to what Greg said previously, I think we have only two options: > > nuttx > nuttx_apps Then you are pro option 1 :-) On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:47 PM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > (..) > In the discussion from a few months ago [1] several reasons were given > why not to use hyphens in the names (they confuse some tools and > underscores are safer). > > Two possibilities for repo names were given: > 1) nuttx and nuttx_apps > or > 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps Based on my experience I am pro 2 choice as it clearly distinguishes rtos part from the apps part, is a self explanatory at first sight, and is more compatible with the potential use cases.. also as Gregory explained this nuttx_rtos part is really the whole RTOS part :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
