Most of the Apache code base is already in that Stack I have checked. Some of my repos too. But they are public anyways.
I understand that this may be frustrating and depressing. I also see that trend of low wage low skill works only available around. Not much respect for skills and experience. Quick wins only. Demands. Enforced changes. Ghost releases with numbers not present anywhere in the branch/tar/doc referencing master with completely different numbers. Like nothing matters anymore. Like "AI _is_already_replacing_coders_ so the boom for IT is over" I heard today from a living non-technical human. All I have ever done all was for myself. For fun, development, creativity, curiosity, problem solving, to help my friends and family, to make world around a better place. Would I play with NuttX or FreeBSD or Atari no matter what, for sure. All that matters is what I do, how I do it, and why. Anyone / anything can make a good use of what I share for free. Sebastien, you may consider GitHub a tool that is used to achieve a particular goal (i.e. NuttX contribution). I also use Windows sometimes when there is no other choice (i.e. machine control, games). What is important is what comes out of that tool. Even if the only goal is your own happiness this is important. If AI evolves (into 01 / Zero-One nation like in Animatrix) and start creating things beyond our comprehension, okay, we have not much choice, but if the world still exist by then, maybe this could be a time to get a family home with garden and finally play with NuttX on Atari :-) There might be also a good outcomes like world peace, cure for cancer, clean and free energy sources, space exploration. Who knows maybe when the burden of daily life paying bills chasing the rabbit is gone, maybe there will be more time for consciousness and self development for those who care :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:06 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The more I think about, I believe you don't have to be concerned about > accessing github for Apache NuttX. Certainly, I respect your choice to > keep your personal code out of "The Stack". But NuttX will most likely > be in the Stack and any changes you submit to NuttX will be in the > Stack. So it may be awkward for you, but I don't see any reason for you > to avoid Apache NuttX in github while moving your personal code elsewhere. > > Am I missing something? You would probably like to make a clean break > with github, but I think continuing to use the Apache NuttX repository > (only) would be the more practical way to accomplished what you want to do. > > On 3/21/2024 4:43 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote: > > I think we need to continue to use PRs at some point in the process. > > PRs are so tied into our CI that I don't think we could work around it. > > > > Can you use another GIT repository? If you create a PR on gitlab or > > bitbucket, someone could move the PR to github. Or perhaps we could > > take commits from a local repository clone? We haven't done it for a > > while, but patches could also be converted to github PRs with a little > > more effort. > > > > I think there are options, but without PRs on github, I don't see how > > you could independently make changes. > > > > On 3/21/2024 4:08 PM, Sebastien Lorquet wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I plan to leave github completely and delete my account, because of > >> this: https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/in-the-stack > >> > >> It is the last of reasons that make me want to leave this place for > >> good. > >> > >> How can we imagine a process so I (and others) can continue to > >> contribute to NuttX without using pull requests from github? or any > >> public "forge" for that matter. > >> > >> Sebastien > >>
