Yamamoto san, there may be some objective factors here, but we may already be on the way to voting. could you please vote again based on the changes from the "code" perspective?
BRs, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com.invalid> 于2025年4月9日周三 06:56写道： > -1 > > reading the recently added text in CONTRIBUTING.md, > this change doesn't seem even eligible for voting because > it is not "absolutely necessary and unavoidable". > > i personally like the change itself and prefer loosening the rules in > CONTRIBUTING.md though. > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 6:13 PM chao an <magicd...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi community, >> >> Some green hand and individual developer who are not familiar with nuttx >> may be confused by the naming of modlib, in currect implement, modlib as an >> elf loader and parser, does not provide any features other than elf. >> >> In this pull request, I plan to rename modlib to elf, and adjust it from >> the architecture level as follows: >> >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15765 >> >> >> [image: image.png] >> >> In addition from other popular operating systems, different loadable >> types are all implemented in binfmt. Therefore, it is also impossible for >> modlib to support formats other than ELF in the future: >> >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_elf.c >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_flat.c >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_misc.c >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/binfmt_script.c >> >> https://github.com/alexbousso/kernel_2.4.18-14/blob/master/fs/binfmt_coff.c >> >> This is where they belong: >> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/tree/master/binfmt >> >> >> So I need your vote here: >> If you prefer modlib, please reply with -1. >> If you recommend libelf, please reply with +1. >> >> BRs, >> >
