On 2025-08-09 16:47:01, Alan C. Assis wrote: > * It passes a wrong message, as something very negative (not all > breaking are bad, or shouldn't be) > * Someone reading our git history could get a wrong impression of the > project > * It will cluttering the title, by convention the title should have only 50 > chars > * It doesn't follow the conventional commits specification: > https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ > > So, please verify the suggested modification here: > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16823 > > The suggestion as defined by conventional commits is to include the > "BREAKING CHANGE: " in the commit log message (foot). That exclamation mark is actually pretty sweet. Does not clutter, easy to grep. And details can be later described in footer in a single sentence like "funcion X has been renamed to Y". Just a note. Wouldn't standard footer be in form "Breaking-change:"? There are already things like "Signed-off-by:".
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
