Hi guys, So given the few fixes that have been committed since those two potential releases I would do the following:
- Cut a new 1.3.1 release - Cut a 2.0-beta2 - Start voting on those 2 releases so we can finally promote them as official. Any objections or blockers? Thanks, Matthieu On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > FYI there are several issues that are currently affecting us, in > order > > of > > > > least important first > > > > i) The shipped eclipse .classpath files refer to invalid project > names > > ( > > > > can get a patch for this easily enough ) > > > > ii) The default .war file thats created doesn't have an empty > > 'processes' > > > > folder in the WEB-INF folder so when it first de-compresses it > > > > refuses to start and we have to shut it down and manually create the > > > folder > > > > ( again can patch this for you) > > > > iii) When it does start up it complains about a missing table in the > DB > > > > (ODE_SCHEMA_VERSION iirc) > > > > iv) The WSDL exposed by the deployment services appears not to be > > > > validating in any tool ( can get a patch for this, we raised this > > > previously > > > > as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-399 , but it still > seems > > > > wrong on our side, perhaps we're not understanding this!) > > > > v) Rapid Deployments + Un-deployments appear to cause issues where > > > folders > > > > remain on the disk (deepDelete fails, similar to ' > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-482' but this seems to be > > > > affecting the .cbp file and the .wsdl . I *think* can see where the > > .cbp > > > is > > > > left open, around the processconf object getCBPInputStream, but I"m > not > > > sure > > > > > > > As a follow up to this posting in case anyone is following, we've fixed > > and > > > provided patches for issues ii, iv and v (ODE-522, ODE-517 and ODE-521 > > > respectively). Issue i was a local issue with an old eclipse install > (my > > > bad), and we're not too worried by issue iii as it only seems to be a > > > warning (although it seems strange to continuously warn on every > statup?) > > > > > > Great and thank you again for your patches. > > No problem, it was one of my team (Col) who worked on and submitted the > patches for me, but we're keen to see ODE > work well just as much ;) > > > > > > > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-523 to track > issue > > #3 > > (missing ODE_SCHEMA_VERSION table) since I think it's worth fixing before > > 1.3 is finalized. > > Ok, thanks :) > > - Cj >
