On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> wrote:
> I would rank ODE-523 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-523> as > highly desirable... > I just fixed it a bit earlier :) > > alex > > PS: Did you mean "Cut a new 1.3 release" ? > Mmh no, I've already cut 1.3 and if we re-release it's going to be a new version number, otherwise we'll end up with some confusion. Hence 1.3.1. Matthieu > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> So given the few fixes that have been committed since those two potential >> releases I would do the following: >> >> - Cut a new 1.3.1 release >> - Cut a 2.0-beta2 >> - Start voting on those 2 releases so we can finally promote them as >> official. >> >> Any objections or blockers? >> >> Thanks, >> Matthieu >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ciaran <ciar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > > FYI there are several issues that are currently affecting us, in >> > order >> > > of >> > > > > least important first >> > > > > i) The shipped eclipse .classpath files refer to invalid project >> > names >> > > ( >> > > > > can get a patch for this easily enough ) >> > > > > ii) The default .war file thats created doesn't have an empty >> > > 'processes' >> > > > > folder in the WEB-INF folder so when it first de-compresses it >> > > > > refuses to start and we have to shut it down and manually create >> the >> > > > folder >> > > > > ( again can patch this for you) >> > > > > iii) When it does start up it complains about a missing table in >> the >> > DB >> > > > > (ODE_SCHEMA_VERSION iirc) >> > > > > iv) The WSDL exposed by the deployment services appears not to be >> > > > > validating in any tool ( can get a patch for this, we raised this >> > > > previously >> > > > > as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-399 , but it still >> > seems >> > > > > wrong on our side, perhaps we're not understanding this!) >> > > > > v) Rapid Deployments + Un-deployments appear to cause issues where >> > > > folders >> > > > > remain on the disk (deepDelete fails, similar to ' >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-482' but this seems to >> be >> > > > > affecting the .cbp file and the .wsdl . I *think* can see where >> the >> > > .cbp >> > > > is >> > > > > left open, around the processconf object getCBPInputStream, but >> I"m >> > not >> > > > sure >> > > > > >> > > > As a follow up to this posting in case anyone is following, we've >> fixed >> > > and >> > > > provided patches for issues ii, iv and v (ODE-522, ODE-517 and >> ODE-521 >> > > > respectively). Issue i was a local issue with an old eclipse >> install >> > (my >> > > > bad), and we're not too worried by issue iii as it only seems to be >> a >> > > > warning (although it seems strange to continuously warn on every >> > statup?) >> > > >> > > >> > > Great and thank you again for your patches. >> > >> > No problem, it was one of my team (Col) who worked on and submitted the >> > patches for me, but we're keen to see ODE >> > work well just as much ;) >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-523 to track >> > issue >> > > #3 >> > > (missing ODE_SCHEMA_VERSION table) since I think it's worth fixing >> before >> > > 1.3 is finalized. >> > >> > Ok, thanks :) >> > >> > - Cj >> > >> > >
