On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> PS: Did you mean "Cut a new 1.3 release" ? >>> >> >> Mmh no, I've already cut 1.3 and if we re-release it's going to be a new >> version number, otherwise we'll end up with some confusion. Hence 1.3.1. >> > > I guess I'm already confused... :-| 1.3 was not officially released so > where's the harm? > A few people already downloaded it and tried it. That's a first chance of confusion. And later when we'll ask "which version are you running?" and the answer is 1.3, which 1.3 does that mean? Version numbers are cheap. I remember we had a similar discussion some time ago on this ML about 1.2 or 1.1, we re-released the same version but the consensus back then was that it was "wrong" :) Matthieu > > alex >
