David E Jones wrote: > > Why are we even having this discussion? It seems like the original > change was trying to fix stuff that isn't broken... and now we're going > on and on about it, even though it wasn't broken in the first place.
Did you miss my reason as to why I did this? I was in framework/base, running ant directly in that directory, then in another terminal was running startofbiz.sh. This problem is exactly the same as the standard make issue, where you need to run make at the top-level no matter what. It's a pain in the ass(hint: search for nested-make considered harmful) > If anyone wants to discuss it further, I recommend writing things in the > form of: > > 1. this is the problem and why > 2. this is what we should do about it > > Without a problem to attack it seems like we're just running in circles. > That it's not fun, but some of us have other things we'd rather be > doing. ;) 1: Running ant in framework/base, to compile src/start, does not update ofbiz in $ofbiz.home. 2: move framework/base/src/start to $ofbiz.home/src, so that one 'component' doesn't actually really contain two.
