Ha thanks Taher, this answer to Michael's question: we indeed need Asciidoctor if we want to transform from Asciidoc to other formats. Then Pandoc can
possibly be used for more possibilities
Jacques
Le 08/11/2017 à 10:33, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
If you check the link you sent, you will notice that asciidoc is not an
input format in pandoc, but rather an ouput format.
On Nov 8, 2017 12:29 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
Le 08/11/2017 à 08:25, Paul Foxworthy a écrit :
On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
I assume that we can use any Asciidoc editor and need not to use
Asciidoctor?
Hi Michael,
Asciidoctor is not an editor, it's a text processor that can convert
AsciiDoc to HTML or DocBook XML. So it's an alternative processor to Pandoc
(https://pandoc.org/).
One of the reasons to choose any wiki-like language (AsciiDoc, Markdown,
etc) is you can use any text editor at all. I use a nice AsciiDoc plugin
for IntelliJ IDEA. Your tastes may vary.
Cheers
Paul Foxworthy
Hi Paul,
Do you know if there are there good reasons to favor Asciidoctor over
Pandoc?
I'm more in favour of the later because now I know it (thanks to you :))
and especially because it offers so much possibilities, see graph here
https://pandoc.org/
You never know what you will need one day...
Jacques
