Hi Sharan,

As I was explaining to Jacques, there is no tool selection issue. Pandoc
cannot handle asciidoc and therefore the best viable choice is asciidoctor.
What is stopping us right now is my delay in implementing the feature ( I
am about half way through in OFBIZ-9873 to tackle the PoC ).

On Nov 8, 2017 1:21 PM, "Sharan Foga" <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi All

At the Open Source Summit in Prague a couple of weeks ago I attended quite
a few documentation related talks and also interviewed one of the
presenters (Robert Kratky from Red Hat) for FeatherCast. He did a talk
about converting legacy docs into more user story based content, so bit
like what we need to do. Anyway his recommendation was Asciidoc and he also
had some links to resources that could help in our documentation journey.

If the tool selection is actually stopping us from moving onto the next
step then let's present the proposal options (e.g Asciidoc, Pandoc etc) and
ask the community to select their preference..

Thanks
Sharan



On 08/11/17 10:33, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:

> If you check the link you sent, you will notice that asciidoc is not an
> input format in pandoc, but rather an ouput format.
>
> On Nov 8, 2017 12:29 PM, "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
> wrote:
>
> Le 08/11/2017 à 08:25, Paul Foxworthy a écrit :
>
> On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I assume that we can use any Asciidoc editor and need not to use
>>
>>> Asciidoctor?
>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>> Asciidoctor is not an editor, it's a text processor that can convert
>> AsciiDoc to HTML or DocBook XML. So it's an alternative processor to
>> Pandoc
>> (https://pandoc.org/).
>>
>> One of the reasons to choose any wiki-like language (AsciiDoc, Markdown,
>> etc) is you can use any text editor at all. I use a nice AsciiDoc plugin
>> for IntelliJ IDEA. Your tastes may vary.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Paul Foxworthy
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
> Do you know if there are there good reasons to favor Asciidoctor over
> Pandoc?
> I'm more in favour of the later because now I know it (thanks to you :))
> and especially because it offers so much possibilities, see graph here
> https://pandoc.org/
> You never know what you will need one day...
>
> Jacques
>
>

Reply via email to