+1 Thanks and Regards -- Pritam Kute
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com > wrote: > I think by now some people might think my last name is "Refactoring" > :) But I always welcome improvements. However, such a change needs to > be carefully done and reviewed and we should ensure that all relevant > artifacts are updated accordingly (widgets, services, scripts, etc > ...) > > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Suraj Khurana > <suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > There are some entities which could be renamed as per their usage. > > > > - *OrderItemShipGroup*: It shows order ship groups and it doesn't > > contain anything at order item level. So, it could be re-named as > > *OrderShipGroup.* > > - *OrderItemShipGroupAssoc: *It do not maintain any association type, > it > > just contains order item with respect to ship group, so this could be > > re-named as *OrderItemShipGroup *to maintain consistency and code > > readablity. > > > > I know that these entities are crucial part of OOTB data model since > > inception. Having thought in mind that 'Naming should be self > explanatory', > > this is a proposal and It would be great to hear communities thought on > > this topic. > > > > Please share your opinions on this. > > > > -- > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Suraj Khurana* | Omni-channel OMS Technical Expert > > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > Cell phone: +91 96697-50002 >
