Thanks and Regards
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com
> I think by now some people might think my last name is "Refactoring"
> :) But I always welcome improvements. However, such a change needs to
> be carefully done and reviewed and we should ensure that all relevant
> artifacts are updated accordingly (widgets, services, scripts, etc
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Suraj Khurana
> <suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > There are some entities which could be renamed as per their usage.
> > - *OrderItemShipGroup*: It shows order ship groups and it doesn't
> > contain anything at order item level. So, it could be re-named as
> > *OrderShipGroup.*
> > - *OrderItemShipGroupAssoc: *It do not maintain any association type,
> > just contains order item with respect to ship group, so this could be
> > re-named as *OrderItemShipGroup *to maintain consistency and code
> > readablity.
> > I know that these entities are crucial part of OOTB data model since
> > inception. Having thought in mind that 'Naming should be self
> > this is a proposal and It would be great to hear communities thought on
> > this topic.
> > Please share your opinions on this.
> > --
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > *Suraj Khurana* | Omni-channel OMS Technical Expert
> > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems*
> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010
> > Cell phone: +91 96697-50002