+1 Suraj for the improvement. Please see my comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Suraj Khurana <
> There are some entities which could be renamed as per their usage.
> - *OrderItemShipGroup*: It shows order ship groups and it doesn't
> contain anything at order item level. So, it could be re-named as
> - *OrderItemShipGroupAssoc: *It do not maintain any association type, it
> just contains order item with respect to ship group, so this could be
> re-named as *OrderItemShipGroup *to maintain consistency and code
You can rename 'OrderItemShipGroupAssoc' to 'OrderShipGroupItems' or
Renaming it to exisitng entity can be complex and confusing for end user.
Thanks & Regards
Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> I know that these entities are crucial part of OOTB data model since
> inception. Having thought in mind that 'Naming should be self explanatory',
> this is a proposal and It would be great to hear communities thought on
> this topic.
> Please share your opinions on this.
> Thanks and Regards,
> *Suraj Khurana* | Omni-channel OMS Technical Expert
> *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems*
> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010
> Cell phone: +91 96697-50002