Re: [PROPOSITION] Demos: replace old by trunk framework only

[Michael Brohl]

We should neither simply remove those links nor should we have anything hard coded.

Regards,

Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de


Am 21.08.18 um 07:00 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:

Let's look for a smarter solution. No need to hurry, better take some time to implement something sustainable.

Of course, but I like to be able to get from the backend to the frontend when it's possible. I don't see any troubles keeping them once it's handled that way, but theoretical ones .

Jacques


Le 21/08/2018 à 01:03, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :

Of course if the community prefers to remove them it's far easier and was what I wanted to do initially before having this idea of hiding links

Simple, don't put any logic that points outwards from the framework. That

is sort of why we split repositories in the first place.


wrote:

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 8:00 PM Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>

Le 20/08/2018 à 16:53, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :

Makes sense. However, i note reading in the JIRA that "we can simply hide the button when the ecommerce component is not present". That sounds like

logic that points outwards which is a bad design IMHO.

I could not find a better way yet, I'm all ears for ideas.

Anyway, I think it is a reasonable step to take. +1

I attached a patch for today at OFBIZ-9241

Jacques

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 5:31 PM Jacques Le Roux <

jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>

wrote:

Hi,

The proposition is in the title.

With the changes I'm introducing with OFBIZ-9241 there will few

differences in UI (and presence of js files) between the framework only

and

the
framework+plugins

I must add:


maybe
      not a big deal.

    * since the old is often no longer supported and a release of it is always available (today R13) for users. I think removing the old demo is     * I found several cases where people, new to OFBiz, considered OFBiz

as

what we call the framework, and were considering the plugins as

optional.

What do you think?

Jacques

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature