Jacques,just 2 days are not much for discussion in an open source community. Please have in mind that people might not have the time to think about and answer to the discussion in such a short timeframe. Most of us are working full time.
I see no need to hurry and propose to put down the vote and wait for at least a week to see if there are additional opinions.
Thanks, Michael Am 22.08.18 um 14:02 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Thanks Julien,At this stage, after 2 days, we already have diverse answers and it's hard to see a clear answer/consensus from that.So after this [PROPOSITION] I'll start 2 [VOTE]s, for: 1. Demos: replace old by trunk framework only?2. Hide, remove or let as is UI links in framework (including applications) to plugins?BTW Julien, no need to put me in copy, I assiduously follow the OFBiz MLs ;)Jacques Le 22/08/2018 à 10:13, Julien NICOLAS a écrit :Hi all,My opinion is to hide the link instead of delete it. I don't know if we have other link in this case but it could be important to keep it in source code. It could be convenient to have it for replacement by the good solutionBut in the same time, we need to think about inter-webapp connection. How a menu from webapp A could be extended by webapp B without putting code in webapp A.It could be interesting to have a new tool bar in product to manage ecommerce when ecommerce is installed. If we have this kind of feature, it could work as well for OOTB webapp like product and stock, party and order, etc.Julien. Le 21/08/2018 à 10:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :OK, that your and Michael's opinions. So you prefer NPEs in code than hiding them when necessary?What others think? Jacques Le 21/08/2018 à 09:45, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :Again, hiding is not a solution and is correcting an error with anothererror. -1On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, 10:37 AM Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>wrote:See my answer in the Jira, we can't tolerate NPEs, they are already therefor too long Being smart is cool, being smart and clean is better ;) Jacques Le 21/08/2018 à 08:57, Michael Brohl a écrit :We should neither simply remove those links nor should we have anythinghard coded.Let's look for a smarter solution. No need to hurry, better take sometime to implement something sustainable.Regards, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH www.ecomify.de Am 21.08.18 um 07:00 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:Of course, but I like to be able to get from the backend to thefrontend when it's possible.I don't see any troubles keeping them once it's handled that way, buttheoretical ones .was what I wanted to do initially before having this idea of hiding linksOf course if the community prefers to remove them it's far easier andJacques Le 21/08/2018 à 01:03, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :Simple, don't put any logic that points outwards from the framework.Thatis sort of why we split repositories in the first place. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 8:00 PM Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>wrote:Le 20/08/2018 à 16:53, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :Makes sense. However, i note reading in the JIRA that "we can simplyhidethe button when the ecommerce component is not present". That soundslikelogic that points outwards which is a bad design IMHO.I could not find a better way yet, I'm all ears for ideas.Anyway, I think it is a reasonable step to take. +1I attached a patch for today at OFBIZ-9241 JacquesOn Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 5:31 PM Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>wrote:Hi, The proposition is in the title. With the changes I'm introducing with OFBIZ-9241 there will fewdifferences in UI (and presence of js files) between the frameworkonlyandthe framework+plugins I must add:* since the old is often no longer supported and a release ofit isalways available (today R13) for users. I think removing the olddemo ismaybe not a big deal.* I found several cases where people, new to OFBiz, consideredOFBizaswhat we call the framework, and were considering the plugins asoptional.What do you think? Jacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature