Scott Gray <[email protected]> writes:
> I just did it as well and it's super annoying. I don't ever want to
> directly reply to messages on our lists, at least without some manual
> effort on my part. Personally I couldn't care less about whether or not
> some idealists think setting reply-to is harmful.
Should I say then that I don't care about people who don't want to make
the effort of configuring and using an email client properly? Let us not
go that path and be respectful to each other.
This topic has nothing to do with “idealism”, it is just about adopting
some practical and safe conventions.
I acknowledge that your current habits makes things impractical for you,
since you were expecting "reply" to mean "reply to {list,group,all}" but
to me this is just confusing.
--
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
