[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12615156#action_12615156
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1884:
------------------------------------------
Just for the record, here is the thread containing my opinions against this
change:
http://www.nabble.com/new-fied-in-CustomerRequestType--tt18436793.html#a18464615
At the end of the day Hans preferred to just ignore my objections and use
another channel (Jira).
By the way, I don't want to be picky and I will table my objections for now.
Jacopo
PS: why did you choose the name "partyId" instead of "responsiblePartyId" (that
at least was a bit more explicit on the meaning of this misplaced field)?
> Customer request automatic assignment using Customer request type (need
> adding field)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-1884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1884
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: order
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Environment: any
> Reporter: Hans Bakker
> Assignee: Hans Bakker
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
>
> If a customer request is entered into the system via a website by the
> requester it is required to be able to assign an employee group who should
> handle the request.
> It is proposed to do this via the Customer request type. In this entity a
> partyId field needs to be added which can relate to the partyRelationship
> entity to create an employee group.
> Then it is possible to list all open customer requests for a certain party or
> partygroup member. If a customer request is processed, the logged in parson
> can be added to the customer request roles entity to indicate that fact.
> So this jira issue proposes to add a field to the 'customer Request type'
> entity to add the field: responsiblePartyId
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
