[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650867#action_12650867
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-2037:
------------------------------------
David, I am sorry, "I hate to say it" but......
The history:
Nov 5: discussed it at the Apachecon: you had no objections.
Nov 9: creation of this issue.
Nov 15: Show the implementation details
Nov: 25: The final implementation.
The amount of work: 40 hours.
no flexibilty? look at the hirarchy?
1. rate per project(workEffort) ie customer is possible
2. rate per person is possible.
3. general rate is possible....
and not give up? I am sorry David.....this is too far for me....
Have a nice day.
> Re-organize RateType, rateAmount and rateCurrency organization in ofbiz.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-2037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2037
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: accounting, humanres, specialpurpose/projectmgr,
> workeffort
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Environment: any
> Reporter: Hans Bakker
> Assignee: Hans Bakker
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: rateChange.diff
>
>
> the rateAmount in ofbiz is defined by the rate type and then by the following
> criteria when defined:
> from most specific to most general:
> 1. for a partyId (partyRate)
> 2. for a workEffort/timeentry (workEffortAssignmentRate)
> 3. for a employee position (EmplPositionTypeRate)
> 4. for a the default rateTypeId (RateType)
> The currency is defined in level 1,4 but not in the others. It should also be
> possible to specify the currency at any level.
> What is proposed:
> ===========
> 1. remove currencyUomId and (normal)rate(amount) in the partyRate and
> rateType (level 1,4) entities
> 2. remove rate(amount) from the workEffortAssignmentRate and employee
> position (level 2,3) entities
> 3. create a new entity: RateAmount with the following fields:
> primary key:
> rateTypeId
> rateCurrencyUomId
> workEffortId
> partyId
> emplPositionTypeId
> periodTypeId (from the PeriodType entity: per
> hour/day/week/month/quarter)
> fromDate
> non-key fields:
> thruDate
> rateAmount
> 4. create a service "getRateAmount" which will retrieve the applicable rate
> amount for the data provided searching from most specific to most general
> 5. depreciate the getPartyRate service.
> 6. create the createRateAmount and deleteRateAmount(expire) service to update
> the new entity
> 7. update existing services and forms.
> QUESTION:
> should the accounting organization partyId be in the key of the new
> RateAmount entity?
> Regards,
> Hans
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
