Actually I did not write this stuff an I have no idea why this choice has been
made.
But I came to this conclusion since it sounded logical, do we really need to track such changes ? Maybe in case of error though (but
tracking errors like that is a bit Stalinian isn'it ? Errare human est...)
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>
Personally I don't think it should be allowed to delete a product from a category, why not just expire it and maintain the
history?
Regards
Scott
On 4/09/2009, at 1:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Please use rather user ML for such questions, see why here :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yAk#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList:[email protected]
Also consider some associations, say a product with a category : no needs to track for an audit on such things. Hence removing a
product from a category is possible...
Thanks
Jacques
From: "buzlite" <[email protected]>
Hmmm....this is a bit confusing. There are mentions of a need for a trail
for auditing purposes. Yet there are several places in ofbiz that permit a
user to actually remove items. Was the deletion added in for some specific
purpose of is the auditing related focus been relaxed? Or have the
community decided to let the user decide whether or not to delete certain
items.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/deleting-features-tp25239836p25274587.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
