From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>
I'm thinking more in terms of why should we delete it rather than why
should we keep it.
For reporting purposes it could be very useful to know what categories
a product was attached to at a given point in time. Perhaps sales
dropped after the product was removed from the category but since we
deleted the record we have no way of discovering that.
Yes, indeed
Jacques
Regards
Scott
On 4/09/2009, at 1:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Actually I did not write this stuff an I have no idea why this
choice has been made.
But I came to this conclusion since it sounded logical, do we really
need to track such changes ? Maybe in case of error though (but
tracking errors like that is a bit Stalinian isn'it ? Errare human
est...)
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>
Personally I don't think it should be allowed to delete a product
from a category, why not just expire it and maintain the history?
Regards
Scott
On 4/09/2009, at 1:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Please use rather user ML for such questions, see why here :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yAk#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList:[email protected]
Also consider some associations, say a product with a category :
no needs to track for an audit on such things. Hence removing a
product from a category is possible...
Thanks
Jacques
From: "buzlite" <[email protected]>
Hmmm....this is a bit confusing. There are mentions of a need
for a trail
for auditing purposes. Yet there are several places in ofbiz
that permit a
user to actually remove items. Was the deletion added in for
some specific
purpose of is the auditing related focus been relaxed? Or have the
community decided to let the user decide whether or not to
delete certain
items.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/deleting-features-tp25239836p25274587.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
