Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
I'm thinking more in terms of why should we delete it rather than why should we keep it. For reporting purposes it could be very useful to know what categories a product was attached to at a given point in time. Perhaps sales dropped after the product was removed from the category but since we deleted the record we have no way of discovering that.Regards Scott On 4/09/2009, at 1:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:Actually I did not write this stuff an I have no idea why this choice has been made. But I came to this conclusion since it sounded logical, do we really need to track such changes ? Maybe in case of error though (but tracking errors like that is a bit Stalinian isn'it ? Errare human est...)Jacques From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>Personally I don't think it should be allowed to delete a product from a category, why not just expire it and maintain the history?Regards Scott On 4/09/2009, at 1:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:Please use rather user ML for such questions, see why here : http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/yAk#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList:[email protected]Also consider some associations, say a product with a category : no needs to track for an audit on such things. Hence removing a product from a category is possible...Thanks Jacques From: "buzlite" <[email protected]>Hmmm....this is a bit confusing. There are mentions of a need for a trail for auditing purposes. Yet there are several places in ofbiz that permit a user to actually remove items. Was the deletion added in for some specific purpose of is the auditing related focus been relaxed? Or have the community decided to let the user decide whether or not to delete certainitems. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-features-tp25239836p25274587.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
