Adrian Crum wrote:
> I'm wondering that too.
>
> Btw, in the "classic" visitor pattern, the code should be:
>
> /** Accept the visitor. **/
> public Object jjtAccept(ParserVisitor visitor) {
> return visitor.visit(this);
> }
>
> The SQLSelect class shouldn't be concerned with (or know about) Object
> data.I can't change that. jjtree auto-generates missing node classes, and this is the pattern is uses. I only have to override the nodes that need special functionality.
