As I said before, there are so many themes in the trunk right now just to
avoid troubles to users.
But we have seen that this is not a good way to manage themes in the long
time.
We need to break this chain now or we will have too many themes in the
trunk.

-Bruno

2011/1/6 Bruno Busco <[email protected]>

> The theme will still be present in the 10.04 releases.
> No production servers should rely on trunk.
>
>
> -Bruno
>
> 2011/1/6 BJ Freeman <[email protected]>
>
>> I have one that uses the flat grey as default
>> so if I do an update from the svn the flat grey will and my customization
>> disappear.
>>
>> my sas uses all those in the themes, with my modification.
>> they will be removed. when the svn update is run.
>>
>> those are just a few examples.
>>
>>
>> =========================
>> BJ Freeman
>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <
>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
>> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>
>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>
>>
>> Bruno Busco sent the following on 1/6/2011 2:00 PM:
>>
>>  I am sorry, BJ, I do not see your point.
>>>
>>> What could be the issue?
>>> We will have less themes to maintain in the trunk (just Flat Grey,
>>> Tomahawk,
>>> Default and Multiflex).
>>> We will have more people that will be able to maintain additional themes
>>> in
>>> the Themes Gallery.
>>>
>>> Production servers will have each one its selected theme (one of the
>>> OOTB,
>>> one of the Themes Gallery or a customized version of them).
>>>
>>> -Bruno
>>>
>>> 2011/1/6 BJ Freeman<[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  how about those that are using ofbiz for SAS and will have many themes
>>>> for
>>>> their clients.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruno Busco sent the following on 1/6/2011 12:51 PM:
>>>>
>>>>  Yes, having more than one theme in the trunk was originally accepted in
>>>>>
>>>>> order to use and show the visual theme selection feature OOTB.
>>>>> Actually Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs and Tomahawk are one the evolution
>>>>> of
>>>>> the other.
>>>>> Each time we decided to create a new theme instead of replacing the one
>>>>> existing just to avoid problems to users.
>>>>>
>>>>> My proposal is to remove Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs and BizznessTime
>>>>> from
>>>>> the trunk and put them in a separate themes repository as suggested by
>>>>> Ryan.
>>>>> Remove the actual version of the Flat Grey from the trunk and put it in
>>>>> the
>>>>> themes repository.
>>>>> Improve the Flat Grey theme in the trunk with the work you guys are
>>>>> doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this way we will have in the trunk two themes for the backend
>>>>> (Actual
>>>>> FlatGrey and Tomahawk) and two themes for the ecommerce (Default and
>>>>> Multiflex).
>>>>> In the themes repository there will be Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs,
>>>>> BizznessTime and the actual FlatGrey.
>>>>> It could be a nice start for the theme repository (and gallery) start.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/6 Jacques Le Roux<[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  inline...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>> 801.671.0769
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Jacques,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I understand your concerns about support, and your thoughts on the
>>>>>>>>> themes has some valid points.  However, in regards to the
>>>>>>>>> BizznessTime theme, I never really intended for that to be "my"
>>>>>>>>> theme
>>>>>>>>> anyway.  I always viewed it as a community theme as that
>>>>>>>>> was it's original intent and it was truly a collaborative effort to
>>>>>>>>> build it between myself, my colleagues at HotWax, BrainFood,
>>>>>>>>> and other members of the the OFBiz community.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Right, sorry for that Ryan. It's only because I know you were one
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>  the
>>>>>>>> "fathers" (the most important I guess) and helped much
>>>>>>>> at the beginning, my apologies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  At any rate, my time issues and focus have shifted significantly
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  the last few months as I have left HotWax and gone into
>>>>>>>>> independent consulting and freelance development.  I plan on taking
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> much more active role in the community in the months and
>>>>>>>>> years ahead.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  That's really a good, very good news!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  As far as theme contributions go, I wonder if maybe it would be a
>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  idea to have a theme repo outside of the trunk that
>>>>>>>>> individuals could commit to?  The problem with theme maintenance
>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> new theme has been added to the trunk is that not
>>>>>>>>> everyone has commit privileges to the trunk.  This makes the
>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> maintenance a lot more time consuming for individual
>>>>>>>>> contributors as they have to rely on patches, updates,
>>>>>>>>> collaboration,
>>>>>>>>> etc, rather than just monitoring and maintaining their own
>>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  This could certainly be discussed as themes are no blocking parts
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>> as *at least one works "perfectly"* (another way is to
>>>>>>>> become committer), opinions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  I think the way that Magento and Wordpress do it are good examples.
>>>>>>>  With
>>>>>>> Wordpress, there is one "official" theme that is
>>>>>>> included with the install, but there are literally thousands of
>>>>>>> themes
>>>>>>> that are not maintained by Wordpress that they list on
>>>>>>> there site http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/, and now with the 3.0
>>>>>>> release you can even search for new themes and install them
>>>>>>> automatically from inside your Wordpress install.  Doing it this way
>>>>>>> fosters wider community support by delegating maintenance of
>>>>>>> these themes to individual contributors rather than forcing it on a
>>>>>>> handful of committers and also allows developers to monetize
>>>>>>> there contributions by offering "premium" themes and plugins.  In
>>>>>>> fact,
>>>>>>> there are many individuals and companies in the Wordpress
>>>>>>> community that make their living solely by selling themes and
>>>>>>> plugins.
>>>>>>>  This furthers solidifies the base of support for the
>>>>>>> project by offering a mid-tier option for someone who wants something
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than OOTB but can't necessarily afford custom
>>>>>>> development.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  This makes good sense indeed. The only difference, I guess, is
>>>>>> unfortunately the width of the audience. This does not mean that we
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> not try...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  801.671.0769
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  From my perspective, I don't see much chance in the Flat Grey
>>>>>>>>> visual
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  theme being abandoned. Enough people use it that it will
>>>>>>>>>> get the attention it needs. If Ryan isn't available to fix
>>>>>>>>>> something,
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> can fix it. If I'm not available, someone else could
>>>>>>>>>> fix it, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2011 6:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Ryan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your screen copies at
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092
>>>>>>>>>>> looks really great! Looking forward for the implementation...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My concerns are that maybe you will not have enough time later to
>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>> up with possible bugs or other issues. Look for instance what
>>>>>>>>>>> happened
>>>>>>>>>>> to Bizzness Time
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2398.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Even if it looks a bit old, we have a theme which works great.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why
>>>>>>>>>>> taking any risks with it? Also I can't see any issues with having
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> themes. The more we have the better, I like to have the choice.
>>>>>>>>>>> Some
>>>>>>>>>>> (rare) people prefer to use old things, see games machines or
>>>>>>>>>>> synthesizers for instance (I still love the DX-7 sound
>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_DX7
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.vintagesynth.com/yamaha/dx7.php)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are any evolved version of Flat Grey yet. So this could be
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> 1st
>>>>>>>>>>> modern one still using the RTL mechanism introduced by Adrian.
>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>> choice the name!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  IMO I see no reason to have a "Flat Grey Evolution" theme.
>>>>>>>>>>> Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> right, the Flat Grey theme hasn't had a visual update in
>>>>>>>>>>>> years and it looks very dated. It needs some love. Let's not add
>>>>>>>>>>>> another improved version, let's just improve the version we
>>>>>>>>>>>> have now. I think that is more efficient and more beneficial in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> long run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as the tabs go, we can still keep a horizontal, tab-like
>>>>>>>>>>>> navigation without actually having the tabs look like tabs.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because, the absolutely do look terrible displayed in two rows.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Adrian, I would be happy to collaborate with you on this. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think I have some ideas that could help. Email me directly if
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>> to hash out some ideas outside of this mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, as far as new admin themes go, I guess I can use
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> an opportunity as well to drop a teaser about a new theme
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been working on already for some time now that I honestly
>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>> will become the go-to theme for scalability and
>>>>>>>>>>>> customization, and that will eventually replace the Flat Grey
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme
>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether. The new theme scales down very well to 800x600
>>>>>>>>>>>> and has minimal styling for maximum flexibility and
>>>>>>>>>>>> customization.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned for more details in the next few days...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>> 801.671.0769
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Chiclet refers to a brand of chewing gum. The tabs look like
>>>>>>>>>>>> pieces
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  of Chiclets chewing gum. They look terrible when they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed in two rows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- On Mon, 1/3/11, Jacques Le Roux<
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  By "chiclet" main navigation style,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you mean the tabs? Then I think we should keep Flat Grey as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is (because there are advantages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have tabs) and create a Flat Grey evolution...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adrian Crum"<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I was thinking we could use colors from the Apache logo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and the BizznessTime theme. I would also like to get rid of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "chiclet"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  main navigation style, and maybe have that menu in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  collapsible left column.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Sascha Rodekamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   From: Sascha Rodekamp<sascha.rodekamp.lynx.de@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Subject: Re: Discussion: Flat Grey Visual Theme
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  "Jacques Le Roux"<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 2:27 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I really would appreciate to keep the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flat Gray. But you're right it needs a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few visual improvements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me think about this, maybe somethink comes to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  my mind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  ..... :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/12/29 Jacques Le Roux<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  IIRW, it's the only really RTL capable. So a big YES to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  of course.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no ideas though :/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adrian Crum"<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Flat Grey visual theme is getting old.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The current version of the theme is based on the original
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and feel of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz when I first joined the community - back in 2004.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Spring of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2007 I added some gradient gifs to make the original style
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After that, the visual theme was converted to a floating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flexible layout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (to fit any size screen), it was made
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  sight-impaired accessible (font size
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  can be changed), and it added support for bi-directional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> layout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (for rtl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> languages). Those design decisions were made by the OFBiz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community and, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my opinion, continue to make the Flat Grey theme the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme when all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else fails. It just works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Despite its advantages, it looks dated. I would like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it more modern, but maintain its advantages over the other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themes. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking it only needs css and gif file updates. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> templates and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javascripts would be maintained.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is interested, they are welcome to help out. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any suggestions or comments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sascha Rodekamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Johanniskirchplatz 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-33615 Bielefeld
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.lynx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to