Groovy supports JSR-223, so there is no reason to treat it differently.
My question has nothing to do with which scripting engine is supplied
with OFBiz.
-Adrian
On 3/4/2012 8:43 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I don't want to interfer with Jacopo's answer, but I guess it's
because Groovy will be implemented OOTB. The others could be but
Groovy is already part of the framework (the inital subject from Erwan
was to completely remove BeanShell OOTB usage), I mean it's the idea
and what Jacopo said already.
I second this idea. Everybody can use her/his preferred scripting
language in custom projects. But using only one language OOTB seems to
be common sense. We chose groovy...
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
The code changes tested fine.
I noticed in your code comments that Groovy should be handled
independently from other scripting languages. Why do you think that?
-Adrian
On 3/4/2012 7:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My changes are in commit 1296762
Help with reviews and tests will be very much appreciated.
Jacopo
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
As far as I know, most scripting engines have some sort of
embedded cache. The problem will be that we can't clear the embedded
cache like we can with our own cache implementation. I don't see
that as a show stopper - it's mostly inconvenient.
I can help out with the conversion. I don't think the task will be
that hard.
Adrian, FYI I am enhancing some of the existing framework code that
uses the GroovyUtil class to simplify this task.
I will commit my code changes today.
Regards,
Jacopo
