On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> Your method would be used instead. > > Exactly. You don't see a problem with that? >
Frankly speaking I don't; I mean, it would be a problem and when we will code services etc. we will have to follow a few rules. But I could use the same exact argument against the proposal of passing to the context a "script" object with a reference to the helper method: I could assign to it a value; and the same applies to any object passed in the context of minilang. But again, I think that this would be an acceptable compromise and I don't see a relevant problem. Jacopo
