This looks like a hack. It would be preferable to find out why ./ant
can't find the class.
-Adrian
On 4/2/2012 12:16 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Mon Apr 2 11:16:10 2012
New Revision: 1308301
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308301&view=rev
Log:
Seems using ./ant for running install and tests is not detecting the class for
cobertura. Testing if the jar is present is making it right. Resolves OFBIZ-4757
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml?rev=1308301&r1=1308300&r2=1308301&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml Mon Apr 2 11:16:10 2012
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ under the License.
</condition>
<condition property="exclude.cobertura"
value="org/ofbiz/base/config/Cobertura*.java">
<not>
-<available classname="net.sourceforge.cobertura.instrument.ClassInstrumenter"
classpathref="local.class.path"/>
+<available property="exclude.cobertura" file="lib/cobertura-1.9.4.1.jar"/>
</not>
</condition>
<patternset id="src.exc.set">