Hi Adrian,

You are right in calling it a hack. I would call it a work around. Please
feel free to create the JIRA for the underlying issue. As for now I would
appreciate it when the hack stays in as the work around until somebody
picks up the JIRA for the underlying issue and solves it.

Regards,

Pierre

Op 2 april 2012 14:42 schreef Adrian Crum <
[email protected]> het volgende:

> This looks like a hack. It would be preferable to find out why ./ant can't
> find the class.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 4/2/2012 12:16 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Author: erwan
>> Date: Mon Apr  2 11:16:10 2012
>> New Revision: 1308301
>>
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1308301&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308301&view=rev>
>> Log:
>> Seems using ./ant for running install and tests is not detecting the
>> class for cobertura. Testing if the jar is present is making it right.
>> Resolves OFBIZ-4757
>>
>> Modified:
>>     ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**build.xml
>>
>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**build.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**
>> build.xml?rev=1308301&r1=**1308300&r2=1308301&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml?rev=1308301&r1=1308300&r2=1308301&view=diff>
>> ==============================**==============================**
>> ==================
>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**build.xml (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**build.xml Mon Apr  2 11:16:10 2012
>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ under the License.
>>          </condition>
>>          <condition property="exclude.cobertura"
>> value="org/ofbiz/base/config/**Cobertura*.java">
>>              <not>
>> -<available 
>> classname="net.sourceforge.**cobertura.instrument.**ClassInstrumenter"
>> classpathref="local.class.**path"/>
>> +<available property="exclude.cobertura" file="lib/cobertura-1.9.4.1.**
>> jar"/>
>>              </not>
>>          </condition>
>>          <patternset id="src.exc.set">
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to