2012/4/2 Adrian Crum <[email protected]>: > This looks like a hack. It would be preferable to find out why ./ant can't > find the class. > I couldn't find a better solution. If anyone has one, this would be great. I faced the same problem as Pierre, when wanting to use the shipped ant.
> -Adrian > > On 4/2/2012 12:16 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Author: erwan >> Date: Mon Apr 2 11:16:10 2012 >> New Revision: 1308301 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308301&view=rev >> Log: >> Seems using ./ant for running install and tests is not detecting the class >> for cobertura. Testing if the jar is present is making it right. Resolves >> OFBIZ-4757 >> >> Modified: >> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml >> >> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml?rev=1308301&r1=1308300&r2=1308301&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml (original) >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/build.xml Mon Apr 2 11:16:10 2012 >> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ under the License. >> </condition> >> <condition property="exclude.cobertura" >> value="org/ofbiz/base/config/Cobertura*.java"> >> <not> >> -<available >> classname="net.sourceforge.cobertura.instrument.ClassInstrumenter" >> classpathref="local.class.path"/> >> +<available property="exclude.cobertura" >> file="lib/cobertura-1.9.4.1.jar"/> >> </not> >> </condition> >> <patternset id="src.exc.set"> >> >> > -- Erwan de FERRIERES
