Hi Pierre,

I understand what you propose and it makes sense; I am onlya bit worried about 
the confusion of having tom many versions in Jira.
For example, if a bug fix is provided for the 10.04 series, then it should be 
most likely planned to be included in the upcoming release 10.04.02; I don't 
see a benefit of having also 10.04.03, 10.04.04, 10.04.05 in Jira.
We could instead create 10.04.03 when 10.04.02 is released.

But I don't have a strong opinion on this; but before creating new versions in 
Jira I would like to get also the point of view of others.

Thanks,

Jacopo

On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:

> Hi Jacopo,
> 
> Currently following releases are identified on the web page (with their
> respective target dates):
> 
> 
>   - April 2012 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.02
>   - October 2012 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.03
>   - April 2013 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.04 (last release of the 10.04 series)
> 
> 
>   Tentative release schedule for the 11.04 series:
>   - May 2012 - Apache OFBiz 11.04.01
>   - September 2012 - Apache OFBiz 11.04.02
>   - March 2013 - Apache OFBiz 11.04.03
>   - September 2013 - Apache OFBiz 11.04.04
>   - April 2014 - Apache OFBiz 11.04.05 (last release of the 11.04 series)
> 
> 
>   Tentative release schedule for the 12.04 series:
>   - April 2012 - creation of the release branch for 12.04 (this is not a
>   release yet)
>   - February 2013 - Apache OFBiz 12.04.01
>   - August 2013 - Apache OFBiz 12.04.02
>   - March 2014 - Apache OFBiz 12.04.03
>   - September 2014 - Apache OFBiz 12.04.04
>   - April 2015 - Apache OFBiz 12.04.05 (last release of the 12.04 series)
> 
> So I would say that all intended releases with a future date should be
> registered in JIRA (with the date set). That will help us ddevelopers (and
> committers) to focus on delivering the best release possible each time. And
> it will help use generate a more detailed 'end-of-month report. It helps
> with timing the issue, and thus communication.
> 
> But developers and committers should be aware of the fact that it doesn't
> make sense to allocate JIRA issues tot more than 1 version/release,
> meaning, that setting the fix version of an issue to e.g. 12.04.01 also
> implies that it is applicable to 12.04.02.
> 
> Thus, when the first release date of a version draws near, we can release
> that version when no blockers or other critical issues are present and
> others (still not fixed issues) can move to the next release.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pierre
> 
> Op 8 april 2012 08:01 schreef Jacopo Cappellato <
> [email protected]> het volgende:
> 
>> Hi Pierre,
>> 
>> now that we have a tentative release plan:
>> 
>> http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
>> 
>> it would be easy to setup in Jira versions for upcoming releases (with a
>> release date); at the moment we could add:
>> 
>> 10.04.02 with release date 2012-04-30
>> 11.04.01 with release date 2012-05-31
>> 
>> Does it sound good?
>> 
>> Jacopo
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jacopo,
>>> 
>>> May I suggest to set a target date for this and the other releases
>> intended
>>> for the near future (ie 09.04.02, 10.04.02, 11.x, 12.x). This will help
>> us
>>> to better identify issues which we intend to address per release. But it
>>> also helps us communicate to the communty, than repeat over and over in
>> the
>>> mailing lists.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Pierre
>>> 
>>> Op 5 april 2012 21:23 schreef Erwan de FERRIERES <
>>> [email protected]> het volgende:
>>> 
>>>> Le 05/04/2012 10:26, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, I think it is now time to start the process, thank you Erwan.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have created the new version with name "SlimDown" (if a better name
>>>>> will be suggested we will change it); now we can create the tasks for
>> the
>>>>> agreed upon decisions so far and use the "Fix Version/s" field to
>> associate
>>>>> them to the roadmap.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Jacopo, now let's work !
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jacopo,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> do we have a better name for the Jira version than slimdown ? And
>>>>>> would it be possible to create the jira version, so we can start on
>>>>>> creating the tasks ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES
>>>> www.nereide.biz
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to