Jacopo,
Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed new
version 09.04.03 has any purpose?
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> I would like to perform the following maintenance
>
> 1) "archive" the following versions (they will disappears from drop down when
> tasks are created):
> Release 09.04
> Release 09.04.01
> Release 10.04
> because they are all for superseded releases; if there are open issues
> assigned ("affects") to them we could bulk move them to versions "Release
> Branch 09.04" and "Release Branch 10.04"
>
> 2) create new versions (for upcoming releases):
> Release 09.04.03
> Release 10.04.03
> however new bugs should always be reported ("affect") against the "Release
> Branch 09.04", "Release Branch 10.04" and "Release Branch 11.04" ; we could
> use the "Release 09.04.03" and "Release 10.04.03" when the task is fixed in
> the branch as the "fixed in" version.
>
> I think that #1 is rather important; I am not sure about #2.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
> PS: I have also created "Release 11.04.01" with a tentative release date of
> May 15: I am going to use this version to log a series of tasks that are
> required before the release; after the release I will "archive" this version
> as the versions in #2 above.
>
