Since we have decided to no longer maintain R09.04 (and below or related, like R09.04.02) I guess it's better to not confuse users and no longer propose "Release Branch 09.04" (or below/related) in Jira. This does not prevent anybody to explicitly provide a patch for below R10.04 release branch users...

Jacques

From: "Vikas Mayur" <vikasma...@gmail.com>
No problem Jacopo :)
The proposal otherwise looks good. We would perhaps need "Release Branch 09.04", even though the code will not be committed to this release branch but still one can post bug (if any) and/or attach patch for the fixes etc.

Regards
Vikas

On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

ah ah, you are right Vikas!
Please disregard the proposal about 09.04.03... I probably need another coffee

Jacopo

On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:

Jacopo,

Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed new 
version 09.04.03 has any purpose?

Regards
Vikas

On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

I would like to perform the following maintenance

1) "archive" the following versions (they will disappears from drop down when 
tasks are created):
Release 09.04
Release 09.04.01
Release 10.04
because they are all for superseded releases; if there are open issues assigned ("affects") to them we could bulk move them to versions "Release Branch 09.04" and "Release Branch 10.04"

2) create new versions (for upcoming releases):
Release 09.04.03
Release 10.04.03
however new bugs should always be reported ("affect") against the "Release Branch 09.04", "Release Branch 10.04" and "Release Branch 11.04" ; we could use the "Release 09.04.03" and "Release 10.04.03" when the task is fixed in the branch as the "fixed in" version.

I think that #1 is rather important; I am not sure about #2.

What do you think?

Kind regards,

Jacopo

PS: I have also created "Release 11.04.01" with a tentative release date of May 15: I am going to use this version to log a series of tasks that are required before the release; after the release I will "archive" this version as the versions in #2 above.





Reply via email to