ah ah, you are right Vikas!
Please disregard the proposal about 09.04.03... I probably need another coffee
Jacopo
On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
> Jacopo,
>
> Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed
> new version 09.04.03 has any purpose?
>
> Regards
> Vikas
>
> On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> I would like to perform the following maintenance
>>
>> 1) "archive" the following versions (they will disappears from drop down
>> when tasks are created):
>> Release 09.04
>> Release 09.04.01
>> Release 10.04
>> because they are all for superseded releases; if there are open issues
>> assigned ("affects") to them we could bulk move them to versions "Release
>> Branch 09.04" and "Release Branch 10.04"
>>
>> 2) create new versions (for upcoming releases):
>> Release 09.04.03
>> Release 10.04.03
>> however new bugs should always be reported ("affect") against the "Release
>> Branch 09.04", "Release Branch 10.04" and "Release Branch 11.04" ; we could
>> use the "Release 09.04.03" and "Release 10.04.03" when the task is fixed in
>> the branch as the "fixed in" version.
>>
>> I think that #1 is rather important; I am not sure about #2.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> PS: I have also created "Release 11.04.01" with a tentative release date of
>> May 15: I am going to use this version to log a series of tasks that are
>> required before the release; after the release I will "archive" this version
>> as the versions in #2 above.
>>
>
