Could not the asm library (not sure what it is exactly) be loaded on the fly with Cobertura?
The less optional libs we have inside, the more we resolve with Ivy, the less issues we get (from all POV) Jacques From: <[email protected]>
Author: doogie Date: Mon May 21 13:43:39 2012 New Revision: 1341021 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1341021&view=rev Log: FIX: Cobertura's version was changed in 1230444, but it wasn't changed in common.xml; this fixes it, so that you can now sorta-run 'tests-cobertura' in framework/base. However, that requires the asm library, which was recently removed, so it still doesn't completely function. This is part of the fix for OFBIZ-4783. Modified: ofbiz/trunk/common.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/common.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/common.xml?rev=1341021&r1=1341020&r2=1341021&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/common.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/common.xml Mon May 21 13:43:39 2012 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ under the License. <taskdef resource="tasks.properties"> <classpath> <fileset dir="${ofbiz.home.dir}/framework/base/lib"> - <include name="cobertura-1.9.3.jar" /> + <include name="cobertura-1.9.4.1.jar" /> <include name="log4j-1.2.16.jar" /> </fileset> <fileset dir="${ofbiz.home.dir}/framework/base/lib/scripting">
