Jacques, As I have stated in the comments regarding OFBIZ-4130, Hans has is own solution in his own environment (growerp). Based on that he is stating that there is no issue. Which is shortsighted, as many will not have that with a default OFBiz implementation.
His setup is not OFBiz! Furthermore, it seems he is not that keen (anymore) on addressing issues raised in the community. As for OFBIZ-5319, this will be resolved when the patch provided in OFBiz-4130 has been committed. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < [email protected]> wrote: > Considering that the last release branch (13.07) was created in July 2013, > and after that we also backported a series of refactoring, we will probably > wait for a few months before creating the new one: this could happen > sometimes during the summer or early autumn. > As regards the Solr component: even if we will decide to commit it it will > go in the specialpurpose folder and then will not be part of the release > branch. > > Jacopo > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm neutral as well. > > > > I'm only concerned by the next freeze, where I'd like to merge the SEO > branch and hopefully commit the Solr component before we freeze (and maybe > some other stuff I don't remember at the moment) > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 24/02/2014 16:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> Are we ready to start the preparation of the first 13.07 release and > then vote for it? Let me know your opinions, I personally don't have a > strong preference. > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Or actually, just to follow a bit more closely our tentative plan we > can follow the order: > >>> 11.04 > >>> 13.07 > >>> 12.04 > >>> > >>> Jacopo > >>> > >>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ok, thank you for the feedback. > >>>> I'd say we can start the process with 11.04 and afterward with 12.04 > and finally 13.07: in a few weeks we will have three new releases. > >>>> > >>>> Jacopo > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Adrian Crum < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> That all sounds good to me. I don't see any need to wait on 13. From > my perspective, the sooner we release it, the sooner users will (hopefully) > upgrade from the older versions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Adrian Crum > >>>>> Sandglass Software > >>>>> www.sandglass-software.com > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2/10/2014 12:32 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would like to discuss with you the short term plans for the > upcoming releases. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is my proposal: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 11.04: > >>>>>> * start the process of releasing the new bug fix release (11.04.04) > now with the goal of releasing it during this month (February) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 12.04: > >>>>>> * as originally planned, the new 12.04.03 can be released in the > next month (March) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 13.07: > >>>>>> * I don't have a strong preference: should we wait a few more > months of stabilization and issue the first release in the summer? Should > we issue a release earlier? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacopo > >>>>>> > >> > >> > >
