That is nice.... As a committer not being able to assess the issue unbiased and not review the patch, but being against implementation of a correction because the committer has no issues in his own modified setup...
I wonder how the community should interpret such actions... Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Hans Bakker <[email protected]>wrote: > On 26/02/14 04:48, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> Jacopo, >> >> >> Now, I don't know what that means when having set up the domain name for a >> tenant as the means to access the tenant environment. Apparently that has >> been developed to have a unique uri per tenant. >> > this is an essential feature if you want run seperate domainnames assigned > to different tenants. Tenant delegator get selected automatically dependent > on the incoming domainname. Nice for frontend e-commerce and backend, no > need to specify the delegator) We even extended this feature here to not > only have a single domainname per tenant but to have multiple. > All these tenant patches are public and available in a seperate tenant > component where you can manage tenants in screens and add and delete and > refresh tenants whitout restarting the ofbiz system. > Check our gerrit system at http://gerrit.antwebsystems.com and > http://growerp.com which we are currently implementing for ourselves and > customers. > > I did not yet try to add this to ofbiz seeing the extended discussion > which is required, to get it in. See the accounting ledger segments i > started last year august and is still not in the base ofbiz system. > > So sorry i do not understand what this patch is supposed to do, for us the > system is working fine. On the other hand if this feature is not blocking > any existing system functions (like ledger segments also not do) then i am > fine with it. > > Regards, > Hans > > >
