grep ":ERROR" ofbiz.log is too complicated?  It achieves exactly the same 
result.

Regards
Scott

On 15/09/2014, at 7:41 pm, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Le 15/09/2014 02:29, Scott Gray a écrit :
>>> If you want an example of its handy use, here is one. I want to monitor 
>>> what's happening in the trunk demo. Because it's a an efficient mean, 
>>> beside tests and reviews, to early spot new introduced errors.
>>> Of course I can got there and run zgrep, but it's much easier to simply 
>>> monitor an error.log file. The same apply in custom project.
>> Could you please explain how it is easier?  There are a lot of errors (I 
>> would say the majority) where the single log line doesn't give you anywhere 
>> near enough information to find out the source and cause.  For those you 
>> ultimately always have to go to the ofbiz.log file to understand the context 
>> of the error.
> 
> To early discriminate if it's an important (or very important) error/s that 
> should be addressed ASAP. In other words to define priorities, notably when 
> in development step with a team.
> 
> Thanks for asking
> 
> Jacques
> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 12/09/2014, at 8:35 pm, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Le 12/09/2014 06:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 9:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Since Jacopo did not answer, here is my proposition.
>>>> Was there a question for me? I was hoping that this waste of time was 
>>>> finished
>>>> 
>>>>> We could, as suggested Nicolas, add some educational comments in 
>>>>> log4j2.xml and add 2 commented out sections for error.log
>>>>> 
>>>> So, you are not happy until you mess up with the log4j2 config file? :-) 
>>>> Apart from you, Jacques, no one complained or asked for modifications to 
>>>> the config file (even after you asked for feedback).
>>> I could be wrong, but it seems to me Pierre and Nicolas expressed something 
>>> about it
>>> 
>>> I'm not asking to put back the error.log w/o good reasons and I already 
>>> explained them
>>> If you want an example of its handy use, here is one. I want to monitor 
>>> what's happening in the trunk demo. Because it's a an efficient mean, 
>>> beside tests and reviews, to early spot new introduced errors.
>>> Of course I can got there and run zgrep, but it's much easier to simply 
>>> monitor an error.log file. The same apply in custom project.
>>> Of course again, I can change the log4j2.xml there as I can schlep a patch 
>>> in all places I would have to in future :/
>>> 
>>> I don't understand why you are so not open to put back the error.log in 
>>> log4j2.xml and qualify this as a mess and almost myself and idiot. Could 
>>> you explain your reasons please?
>>> 
>>> For the other part (comments), I explained why I prefer to have comments in 
>>> files over having an online documentation, ever if of course having both is 
>>> not bad (as long as the online doc is updated).
>>> 
>>> Jacques
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Jacopo
>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 09/09/2014 15:10, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>>>>> And for whom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Op 9 sep. 2014 om 14:23 heeft Jacques Le Roux 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le 09/09/2014 13:26, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 09/09/2014 12:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> This is the main reason the trunk should be kept as clean as 
>>>>>>>>> possible, instead of changing stuff to fit committers' personal 
>>>>>>>>> preferences.
>>>>>>>> It's clear and good to simplify the configuration on production site.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On some other projet (mostly on debian ;) ), configuration file 
>>>>>>>> contains few enable element but so mostly commented configurations 
>>>>>>>> with context explication of the reason to use it.
>>>>>>>> With a good text editor (notepad no match) it's also clear and simple 
>>>>>>>> and help uncover some other view.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No I don't use trunk for my configuration, I have my own parameters 
>>>>>>>> with my own method to deploy them :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's a very interesting point Nicolas. The problem is now to know 
>>>>>>> what means "as clean as possible" in Jacopo's sentence above
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to