Le 21/10/2014 17:01, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I believe, the problem is more about people not knowing where to post things,
else of course Jira is a perfect fit.
Though I (hopefully I'm not alone) normally monitor Confluence (including
comments) but https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8323
Anyway I normally receive all changes by mail.
Also please read my comment to Julien about how to handle changes in not open
Confluence spaces: http://markmail.org/message/yk2l3d22qenipqwz
It's easier for committers than to have to check multi-places :/
Of course when those comments are about issues in code Jiras should be opened
Jacques
Pierre, do you have something specific in mind about overlooked comments, I
mean a list, etc.?
Jacques
Le 21/10/2014 14:43, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
It would be good to have a well organized and supported system for tracking
defects of all types including documentation.
The JIRA has a very very helpful features that would allow us to identify the
importance of problems, any version dependencies, assigned person, etc.
Ron
On 21/10/2014 7:45 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi all,
Currently we only register issues related to the OFBiz code. But we also
see a lot of comments in wiki pages regarding corrections. These comments
can exists quite a long time and it seems that these are frequently
overlooked.
Should we not also have a setup in JIRA regarding the web and wiki pages?
This helps us to stay aware of bugs and improvements thereof, and help us
to track contributors and patches. Having JIRA issues for this seems to be
done also in a number of other Apache projects.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
