Thanks, Jacques. Regards,
Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > Le 21/10/2014 22:53, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> Jacques, >> >> The problem is indeed where to post the issues. There is no solution >> available to do patches to pages in the website and improvement comments >> in >> the restricted spaces are all over the place. >> > > Long ago, the community decided to go with comments. I don't see a need to > change that. Not all comments in Confluence are important or even relevant. > > And regarding the latter >> aspect these comments can stay visible for quite some time due to busy >> schedules (and other interests) of those capable to implement the changes. >> Having those comments there for a longer time is not good regarding >> branding and adoption. >> > > If you are really interested/concerned simply add comments where you find > relevant and I will do a complete review. > > >> Having a JIRA setup for the website and restricted spaces will provide the >> one place and will create insights about what is still open, what is fixed >> and and when. Plus it helps identifying those committers that could become >> committers. >> > > If there are important things to tackle in Confluence which are neglected > then of course the way is to create a Jira task type issue. > I will add a Confluence component option for this (in Jira only of > course!). > > Jacques > > >> All in all not a bad suggestion and improvement. >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >> I believe, the problem is more about people not knowing where to post >>> things, else of course Jira is a perfect fit. >>> Though I (hopefully I'm not alone) normally monitor Confluence (including >>> comments) but https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8323 >>> Anyway I normally receive all changes by mail. >>> >>> Pierre, do you have something specific in mind about overlooked comments, >>> I mean a list, etc.? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 21/10/2014 14:43, Ron Wheeler a écrit : >>> >>> It would be good to have a well organized and supported system for >>> >>>> tracking defects of all types including documentation. >>>> The JIRA has a very very helpful features that would allow us to >>>> identify >>>> the importance of problems, any version dependencies, assigned person, >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> Ron >>>> >>>> On 21/10/2014 7:45 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Currently we only register issues related to the OFBiz code. But we >>>>> also >>>>> see a lot of comments in wiki pages regarding corrections. These >>>>> comments >>>>> can exists quite a long time and it seems that these are frequently >>>>> overlooked. >>>>> >>>>> Should we not also have a setup in JIRA regarding the web and wiki >>>>> pages? >>>>> >>>>> This helps us to stay aware of bugs and improvements thereof, and help >>>>> us >>>>> to track contributors and patches. Having JIRA issues for this seems to >>>>> be >>>>> done also in a number of other Apache projects. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> >>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>
