As an aside to this, and also what I mentioned in the flat grey vote thread:
> I think you rely on lazy consensus too much. Not many contributors have > as much time as you to give to the project and formulating an argument > against something (and then continuing the discussion) can take up a lot of > time and energy. In my experience people are generally very quick to agree > to good ideas (because it takes no effort other than to reply +1) so if you > get *no* responses then you should IMO take pause before pushing ahead. > Out of curiosity I took a look at your activity this month: 24 discussion begun 11 commits that triggered a discussion 80 other commits that presumably required some level of review While your contributions are appreciated, please be aware of the burden this high level of activity places on the rest of the active contributors and the time consumed is time that those contributors could be putting into pursuing their own priorities. Given this, do you really think it is fair to get annoyed when people don't respond quickly enough for you? Does it seem wise to apply lazy consensus to decisions that don't receive much feedback? Regards Scott On 25 September 2016 at 11:00, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Calm down Jacques, I'm sure Michael will respond when he has a chance. > This isn't a big deal and I don't see why there would be any rush to fill > your request. > > Regards > Scott > > On 23 September 2016 at 21:38, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >> After 4 days clearly nobody cares. I guess Michael does not want to "open >> source" his process and nobody cares about having this information monthly >> in the blog or not. >> >> Closed >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> Le 19/09/2016 à 10:26, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >> >>> Hi All, Michael, >>> >>> Like we have a dedicated page for releases creation[1] in wiki, and >>> though it's of less importance, I think we should have a such page for the >>> "monthly Jira issues list" creation in the blog >>> >>> Currently it's done by Michael, based on a work he previously did and >>> continue to do but only in German (eg https://www.ecomify.de/blog/ap >>> ache-ofbiz-news-august-2016-1250/) >>> >>> It should be at least documented in order to not only depend on Michael >>> but to also possibly lighten the burden brought on him. >>> >>> I know you voluntarily proposed to do it Michael, and again I thank you >>> for that! >>> >>> Unfortunately this adds again some burden on you, because AFAIK you are >>> currently the one person able to create this wiki page. Thanks! >>> >>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release >>> +Management+Guide+for+OFBiz >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >> >
