My preference is to migrate to the Groovy DSL, and enhance it if required. The Groovy DSL is the natural evolution of the core concepts and strengths of Minilang and is preferable, in my opinion, to plain Java for the implementation of business logic.
Jacopo On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote: > Hi All, > > according to the discussion in [1] and the Jira issue [2] we decided to > deprecate mini lang and migrate it to Java and/or Groovy code. > > To help contributors finding the right approach for the migration, we > should define which mini lang code should be migrated to Java code, groovy > or some DSL (which has to be further developed). > > I'd propose to generally migrate services, events and tests to Java code > to begin with. > > > There was also a proposal by Paul Foxworthy [3] to have an automatic > conversion between mini lang and groovy DSL. Maybe we can extend this to > generate Java code also? > > Any ideas and approach to do this? > > > Happy to hear your opinions, > > best regards, > > Michael Brohl > ecomify GmbH > www.ecomify.de > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/253b41060a295b8ab68bc78 > 763cc129fc74b712cf776f8716022097f@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9350 > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6ce592d253c102e50f25f5f > 2095dab1e9b7c54e48260b9e6d1cda9e1@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E > > > >
